Link to return to Modern Physics front page
Links to specific sections in the text:
13.a. Nuclear Composition, Forces, and Size
13.b. Nuclear Binding and Semiempirical Formula
13.c. Nuclear decays
13.d. Radioactivity
Nuclei have been known to be composed of nucleons, neutrons and protons, since 1930. Neutrons and protons have almost equal masses mp = 938.3 MeV/c2, mp = 939.6 MeV/c2. Neglecting the less then 1% binding energies, the mass of nuclei is obtained from the total mass of neutrons and protons. The number of protons in a nucleus is Z, the atomic number characterizing elements. The number of protons, Z, equals to the number of electrons in a neutral atom, thus it determines chemistry. The mass number, A, is the total number of nucleons in the nucleus, A=Z+N, where N is the number of neutrons. The number of neutrons does not affect chemistry, but only nuclear mass, and thus physical density. Nuclei of the same element (Z values are equal) with different values of A, and consequently N, are called isotopes. Nuclei of different isotopes can have vastly different properies.
Numerous experiments (scattering and other) have shown that neutrons and protons interact with each other the same way as protons and protons (save the Coulomb repulsion) and neutrons and neutrons. Nuclear forces are oblivius of the charge of the nucleon. Nuclear forces are of very short distance. Their range is about 1 fermi= 10-15m, five orders of magnitude smaller then the Bohr radius. At the same time nuclear forces are very strong. A fair comparision is given by the effective nuclear potential proposed by Yukawa and the Coulomb potential. The coulomb potential between two protons is
VC(r) = ke2/r,
while the Yukawa potential has the form of
VY(r) = -g2 e-mr/r,
where m µ 1/1 fermi and g>>e. In other words, at large distances, r >>1/ m the Coulomb potential completely overwhelms the nuclear potential, at short distances the nu clear potential is much stronger and attractive, thus able to create a bound state of positively charged protons.
The very short range of nuclear forces determines the nature of nuclear binding about which we will say much more in the next section. The very short range of nuclear forces implies that if use the classical picture of nucleons that in the nucleus a nucleon only interacts with its neighbors. Inside the nucleus every nucleon sees the same types of potential, created by its neighbors. In other words, the potential energy for a nucleon inside the nucleus can be well represented by a flat potential well. The collection of nucleons inside the nucleus is called nuclear matter. Due to the short range of nuclear forces nuclear matter is fairly homogeneous inside nuclei. It follows then the volume of nuclei is proportional to the total number of nucleons, A. Then the volume is V = 4 p /3 R3 and we obtain that the nuclear radius is proportional to A1/3, R = R0 A1/3. Empirically, R0 turns out to be 1.2 fermi. This shows that the radii of all nuclei are between 1 and 6 f.
Let us determine the density of nuclear matter. The best guess is that, since the radius of nuclei is five orders of magnitude smaller then those of atoms, and atoms packed together create measured densities, the density of nuclear matter is (105)3 = 1015 times as large as that of ordinary matter. Since we know the nuclear mass and size the calculation can be made more precise.
dn = mp A / (4 p R03 A / 3 ) = 3 mp / 4 p R03 = 2.3 x 1017 kg m-3 . This is indeed 2.3x1014 times as large as the density of water.
One consequence of the homogeneity of nuclear matter is the flat nuclear potential. The depth of this potential is approximately 40 MeV. That of course does not mean that every nucleon has a binding energy of 40 MeV. Both protons are fermions, have s=1/2, so they satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle. If we quantize the nucleons as particles in a box, then on every energy level (unless levels are degenerate) there can only be two nucleons, one with spin up one with spin down. The fermi energy level for neutrons, as we learned in statistical physics is
EFn = (h2/2m) (3N/8 pV)2/3
If we neglect coulomb interactions (as it is true for light nucleit) then the number of neutrons is the same as the number of protons, N=Z=A/2. Then the fermi energy for neutrons and for protons is the same
EFn = EFp = (h2/2m) (9/64 p2R03)2/3,
independent of the size of the nucleus as well. Then the average kinetic energy is 3/5 EF is also independent of the size. The average energy is then E=K+V µ -8 MeV is also roughly constant. Stable nuclei have the same number of neutrons and protons because if the numbers are not equal then at the top energy level it is advantageous for a neuton to transform into a proton by beta decay or for a proton to transform into a neutron by a positron decay. Therefore in the most stable nuclei the top energy levels of neutrons and protons are equal, as shown in the figure below.
Coulomb interactions cannot be neglected however, mostly for heavier nuclei, which, due to their long range inrease with size. Coulomb repulsion acts on protons only, so in larger nuclei the depth of the potential well for protons is less then 40 MeV. Consequently one needs less protons to fill up the levels to the same energy level where the highest energy neutrons are. Therefore, in heavier nuclei Z is smaller than N.

The simplest nuclear model is the liquid droplet model, which uses the same notions we have been applying until now. One of the important aims of models to succesfully describe the dependence of the binding energy on N and Z. The binding energy is defined as the the total mass energy of constituent nucleons minus the mass energy of the nucleus. This is the total energy one needs to invest to decompose the nucleus into nucleons.
B(Z,N) = c2 ( Z mp + N mn - M(Z,N) ),
where M(Z,N) is the mass of the nucleus. The interesting quantity is the binding energy per nucleon. B(Z,N) /A. In the roughest nuclear model it is a constant (8 MeV). Experimentally for light nuclei it is much less than 8 MeV, it reaches its maximum in the range of 50<A<80 and starts to decrease for heavier nuclei again. The semiemprical formula provides an approximate description of B(Z,N) using physical principles to find various types of terms, but using phenomenological coefficients.
B(Z,N) = C1 A - C2 A2/3 - C3 Z(Z-1)/A1/3 - C4 (N-Z)2/ A.
The first term of the semiempirical formula expresses the fact that the depth of the nuclear potential well and the average kinetic energy of nucleons is independent of the size of the nucleus and thus the total contribution of all nucleons is proportional to their numbers. If we divide by A, this term alone would give the (not quite correct) constant prediction for B(Z,N)/A. The second term is the so called surface term. Nucleons near the surface of the nucleus feel a less deep potential well, because they are surrounded by nucleons on one side only. Due to the constant density the number of these nucleons is proportional to the size of the surface of the nucleus, 4 pR2 = 4 p R02 A2/3. In other words, this term is proportional to A2/3. This term has the strongest influence on the binding energy of small nuclei, because the ratio of the first two terms is the largest for small A. This is the term that causes the smallness of the average binding energy of small nuclei.
The third term of the semiempirical formula is the Coulomb term. Each pair of protons contributes to the Coulomb term equally. The number of protons is Z, so the number of proton pairs is Z(Z-1)/2. The Coulomb energy is proportional to the inverse distance as well. The average inverse distance grows as the radius of the nucleus, R that is proportional to A1/3. Thus the total Coulomb energy is proportional to Z(Z-1)/A1/3. The fourth term of the formula expresses the fact that there is a gain of energy if a neutron is transformed into a proton (or vica versa) if the number of protons is larger than that of the neutons.
If one optimizes B(Z,N) with respect to Z (or N) at fixed A, then one obtains a prediction for the binding energy of most stable isotopes. Then plotting the curve as function of A one can get a very good agreement with experimental date when one fits coefficients Ci.
If one increases Z, the fastest growing term of the semiempirical formula is the Coulomb term. If we roughly assume that A increase linearly with Z then the coulomb term is proportional to Z5/3. Clearly at some not too large value of Z it will completel overtake the volume term C1 A that will make the nucleus completely unstable. No nuclei with Z>120 can exist. This is the direct consequence of the long range nature of coulomb forces.
The simple minded liquid droplet model can be replace by more sophisticated models that take into account the very important spin-orbit interaction of nucleons.Maria Goeppert-Meyer has succeeded to explain the so called magic numbers by using a shell model of nuclei. If Z or N takes on any of the magic number values, 2,8,20, 28, 50, 82, 126 then the nuclei are especially stable. Adding one extra nucleon decreases the binding energy substantially.
Many isotopes are radioactive. Radioactive nuclei are not stable they decay into other nuclei after a certain amount of time. The nature of these decays will be studied later.
The basic tenet of decays of particles atoms, nuclei, molecules and other quantum systems is that they do not at all know how long they lived before. As in the military they only know the name and identification number, quantum systems carry a limited amount of information, a certain number of quantum numbers and that is all. Nothing else distinguishes two nuclei in excited states than their excitation energy, and momentum and orientation of angular momentum. Thus for each and every nucleus in the same excited state has the same chance to decay in every second. Of course this probability depends on the excited state itself; different excited states have different probabilities of decay. Then let us suppose that at a given moment we have N nuclei in a given state. After decay these nuclei transform into a different system, so the number of nuclei in this state will decrease. The change of the number N in time dt is dN. Sice every nucleus has the same chance to decay and the probability of decay is proportional to dt we have
dN = - dt N l,
where l is a constant of proportionality, the decay constant, characterizing the decay process. This equation is separable, giving
dN / N = - dt l,
or after integration
log N = log N0 - t l,
where log N0 is an integration constant. Exponentiating gives the exponential decay law
N = N0 e-lt,
where the significance of the integration constant N0 is clear: it is the number of nuclei in the given state at t=0. The significance of l can be understood easily if we calculate the time needed for half of a certain sample of radioactive nuclei to decay. This time T1/2 is called half-life. At t= T1/2 we have
N0/2 = N0 exp{- l T1/2 },
or taking the log of both sides
T1/2 = log 2 / l.
in other words, l = log2 / T1/2. After k halflives, i.e. t=k T1/2 the size of the sample decreases to
N = N0 exp{- l k T1/2 } = N0 exp{- ( log2 / T1/2) k T1/2 } = N0 / 2k.
When one measures radioactive decays then one cannot measure N directly. Using counters one measures the number of decaying nuclei per unit time, dN/dt = R, called activity. Using the exponential decay law one obtains
|dN/dt |= R = N0 l e-lt = R0 e-lt,
where R0 is the activity at t=0. The activity is measured in curies or in bequerels.
Radioactive carbon dating is based on the folllowing facts:
Example: Chemical analysis shows that a bone fragment contains 10 g of C. Its activity is 50 counts/min= 0833 / s. How old is the bone fragment?
Solution: The total number of C atoms in the fragment is N = (6
x 1023 mole-1 / 12 g mole-1) 10 g
= 5 x 1023 Nuclei.
The initial number of 14C nuclei is N14 = 5
x 1023 x 1.3 x 10-12 = 6.5 x 1011
Initial activity is R0 = N0 l = 6.5 x 1011
log2 /(5730 x 365 x 24 x 3600) = 2.53 s-1
Since R = R0 e-lt we obtain
l t = log ( 2.53/0.833) = 1.11
Then we obtain t = 1.11/ l = 1.11 x
5730 / log(2) = 9180 years.
Thre most frequent radioactive decays are a, b, and g decays. These are briefly described as
There are many isotopes that are naturally radioactive, especially of heavy elements. All isotopes of all elements Z> 83 (heavier then Pb and Bi) are radioactive. All of them follow chains of decays that end up in stable isotopes of either Pb or Bi. Typical example is the most stable isotope of U, 23892U. Its lifetime is 4.5 billion years, so much of it created at the formation of the solar system is still with us. After decaying into Th, as shown above after a series of decays (8 a decays and 4 b decays) it reaches the final state of 20680Pb. This is called a radioactive series. There are several known series, all combinations of a decays and b decays.